Nintendo Switch NAT Traversal Failed: What to Check

Nintendo Switch NAT Traversal Failed: What to Check

Daniel Kovács
September 4, 2026· Updated October 9, 2026· 10 min read

When your Switch says the NAT traversal process has failed, the console reached the internet but could not build a direct path to another player's console. A Nintendo Switch NAT traversal failed message therefore points to the peer-connection path rather than basic internet access, and both players' NAT environments can affect it.[1] Record the Switch connection-test result, identify whether every player or only one player is affected, and change one network layer at a time.

Key Takeaways

  • Use the Switch result—NAT A through F—rather than another console's Open, Moderate, or Strict labels.
  • A successful internet test does not prove that peer-to-peer game traffic can be established.
  • A second router behind an ISP gateway can create two translation layers and a harder inbound path.
  • Compare one game, one player, and one alternate network before editing router settings.
  • Avoid DMZ and blanket port forwarding; preserve the original configuration and escalate with evidence.

The Entertainment troubleshooting hub covers the wider gaming and streaming cluster. This guide starts after the console can reach Nintendo services but cannot reliably form an online session. For a queue that merely takes a long time, use the matchmaking diagnostic instead.

These checks follow the Nintendo documentation listed below for Switch-family consoles; menu options depend on the model and installed system version. The author has not performed a complete end-to-end test of this workflow.

What does NAT traversal mean in online gaming?

Most home routers use network address translation (NAT): several devices share one public address, and the router normally admits only replies to connections a device started. NAT traversal is the step in which two consoles, each behind its own router, try to find a route that lets game traffic reach each other directly. Nintendo rates the tested path from A, best for peer-to-peer communication, to F, where peer-to-peer communication cannot be completed.[3]

When the process fails, one side's NAT, firewall, or extra gateway layer did not let the other console's traffic through, so the session cannot form even though both consoles are online. The fix lies in the path between players, not download speed, which is why the steps below collect evidence before any router change.

1. Which step shows Nintendo Switch NAT traversal failed?

Write down the exact error, game, mode, local time, and whether the failure happens while creating a room, joining a room, or starting the match. Test two different online games if available. A failure in one title can belong to that title's service, while the same failure across several titles points more strongly to the console or network path.

Separate these outcomes:

ObservationMost useful next branch
Nintendo connection test itself failsRepair basic internet or account access first
Test succeeds, but no player can connectInspect NAT result and home gateway chain
Only one friend cannot connectCompare both players' NAT and networks
Room forms, but the match later dropsUse the separate disconnect workflow
Invitation never arrivesCheck invitation, privacy, and platform state

Do not change router settings before preserving this baseline. A screenshot or note of the result lets you tell whether a later change helped or merely produced a different symptom.

2. How do you run the Nintendo Switch connection test?

Open System Settings, select Internet, and choose Test Connection. Nintendo says the result includes internet connectivity, global IP address, NAT type, download speed, and upload speed. Its Switch scale runs from A, best suited to peer communication, through F, where peer communication cannot be completed.[2][3]

Record the connection name and NAT letter, but do not publish the global IP address. Repeat the test only after the console and network have returned to a stable state. A single letter is a diagnostic clue, not proof that a specific game server, friend, or router feature is healthy.

Nintendo's current Switch guidance uses A–F. Do not translate those letters into the Open, Moderate, and Strict vocabulary from older Nintendo 3DS documentation; that is a different product-specific scheme.

3. What does the Nintendo Switch NAT type tell you?

Nintendo describes A as preferred for peer-to-peer communication and B as compatible with most other NAT types. More restrictive results narrow the set of peers that can establish a session; Nintendo specifically notes that a D result generally connects only to A, while F cannot complete peer communication.[2]

The result describes the tested network path, not the console's permanent identity. Moving the same console to another network can produce a different letter. It also does not mean that lower latency, matchmaking population, subscription eligibility, or a game's service status is automatically good.

Use the letter with scope evidence. If A or B fails with every player, check game status, latency, or router state. If D or F appears across several games, map the translation layers before trying random settings.

4. Is the problem limited to one player or every player?

Nintendo notes that both players' NAT environments can affect a peer connection.[1] Test with at least two different players if practical, and ask the failing friend to run the same connection test without sharing their global IP publicly.

Use a small comparison grid:

  1. Same game and same network, different player.
  2. Same player and network, different game.
  3. Same console and game, temporary alternate network.
  4. Same home network, another compatible console if available.

If only one pairing fails, avoid rebuilding your whole home network. The restriction may be on the other side or in the interaction between both paths. If all pairings fail, continue with your own gateway chain. A missing invitation belongs in the multiplayer invitation checklist, not this NAT path.

5. How many routers are between the Switch and the ISP?

Draw the physical path from the Switch to the internet. A simple setup is Switch → one combined modem/router → ISP. A common double-router setup is Switch → personal router → ISP gateway → ISP. Mobile hotspots, mesh systems in router mode, apartment networks, and carrier-grade NAT can add another boundary.

Check labels and management pages rather than guessing from the number of boxes. A modem may bridge traffic without routing; a gateway usually combines both jobs. If two devices both issue private addresses and perform routing, the console may cross two NAT layers.

Do not expose the console through a DMZ or forward all ports to “prove” double NAT. Those changes create unnecessary inbound exposure and can hide which layer actually caused the problem. If the ISP gateway supports a documented bridge or pass-through mode, ask the ISP or router vendor how it affects phone, television, and other bundled services before changing it.

6. Which comparison test isolates Wi-Fi, equipment, or the ISP?

Start with reversible comparisons. Move the console closer to the access point or use a supported wired adapter, then rerun the connection test. This separates radio quality from the wider route, although a wired result can still use the same restrictive gateway.

Next, restart the console and fully restart the modem and router in their documented order. Nintendo recommends retesting after each network change and restarting network devices as part of NAT troubleshooting.[1] Preserve any ISP voice or alarm-service instructions before disconnecting equipment.

A brief test on a trusted mobile hotspot or another household network is especially informative. If the same game and account work there, the home gateway or ISP path becomes the leading branch. If both networks fail, check the game's status and use the server-versus-local diagnostic.

7. Which router changes are safe to try one at a time?

Install normal console and router firmware updates first. Save or photograph the current router settings, change one documented option, restart only if the vendor requires it, and rerun the Switch test. Undo the change if it does not improve the result.

Reasonable vendor-assisted checks include:

  1. Confirming that only one device is operating as the router.
  2. Checking whether UPnP is supported, enabled, and functioning as documented.
  3. Test the IPv6 Connection option only if your console actually offers it and Nintendo’s current guidance applies to your model and topology. If the option is absent, skip it; do not disable IPv6 across the home network. Record the original setting, then on the console follow HOME Menu → System Settings → Internet → Internet Settings → your network name → Change Settings and turn IPv6 Connection off. Retry the same connection test and restore the setting if there is no improvement.[1]
  4. Checking for guest-network or client-isolation rules that prevent expected local communication.
  5. Asking the ISP whether the line uses carrier-grade NAT and whether another supported service profile exists.

Do not factory-reset a shared router until you have an export, ISP credentials, and a recovery plan. Do not use ports 1–65535, DMZ, or an “open everything” rule as a routine fix. AethoVPN can change the route used by compatible devices, but it cannot remove translation performed by an ISP gateway or guarantee a better Switch NAT type.

8. What evidence should you send to support?

Contact the owner of the unresolved layer. The router vendor handles its configuration, the ISP can explain gateway and carrier-grade NAT behavior, Nintendo can interpret the console result, and the game publisher can investigate title-specific sessions.

Send a compact record:

  1. Console model and current system version.
  2. Game, mode, exact error, local time, and time zone.
  3. Connection-test success, NAT letter, and approximate speeds—without the global IP.
  4. Whether one player, every player, one game, or several games are affected.
  5. Gateway chain and router models.
  6. Wired, Wi-Fi, and alternate-network results.
  7. Every setting changed and whether it was restored.

Ask for the next supported diagnostic, not a guarantee of NAT A. If the issue changes into a general service failure, return to the server diagnostic rather than continuing router experiments.

Summary

  • Read the Nintendo Switch A–F result directly and keep the first test as a baseline.
  • Compare more than one player and game before assuming the home router is at fault.
  • Map every routing layer, including an ISP gateway or carrier-grade NAT.
  • Prefer wired and alternate-network comparisons over broad firewall exposure.
  • Retest after one reversible change and escalate with the complete comparison record.

FAQ

Can the Switch have internet access but still fail NAT traversal?

Yes. Basic access proves that the console can reach Nintendo services, while a peer session may require a path that the tested NAT environment cannot establish.

Is NAT type B bad on Nintendo Switch?

Not normally. Nintendo says B is compatible with most NAT types, so repeated failures with B should also be checked for player scope, game status, latency, and router condition.[2]

Why can I connect to some friends but not one person?

Both network environments participate in a peer connection. Test other players and ask the affected friend to record their own NAT result before either household changes equipment.[1]

Does faster download speed change the NAT type?

No. Speed and NAT are separate outputs in the connection test. A fast download can coexist with a restrictive peer-connection path.

Should I put Nintendo Switch in the router DMZ?

No, not as a routine troubleshooting step. It increases exposure and removes useful isolation; use vendor-supported, minimal changes and preserve the original configuration.

Will port forwarding always produce NAT type A?

No. The ISP path, multiple gateways, carrier-grade NAT, router behavior, and the other player's path can still determine the result.

When should I contact my ISP about Switch NAT traversal failures?

Contact the ISP after repeatable home-versus-alternate-network evidence points to its gateway or upstream translation. Ask whether the line uses carrier-grade NAT and what supported options exist.

Sources:

  1. Nintendo Support — NAT Related Troubleshooting on Nintendo Switch 2 and Nintendo Switch — https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/22455/~/nat-related-troubleshooting-on-nintendo-switch
  2. Nintendo Support — Unable to Connect With Others Online — https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/22541/~/unable-to-connect-with-others-online-%2528errors-during-match-making-process%2529
  3. Nintendo Support — How to Use the Internet Connection Test — https://en-americas-support.nintendo.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/22462/~/how-to-use-the-internet-connection-test-on-nintendo-switch

Sources checked 9 October 2026.


Related Articles:

Start your 3-day free trial

Sign up to experience all premium features at no cost.

*Available only to new users. Each user is limited to one trial.

Nintendo Switch NAT Traversal Failed: What to Check | AethoVPN